Friday, February 22, 2008

Unconscious for my Conscious

Well, it's a brand new year. Time for me to begin screwing up the date field on my checks for about a month or so, then spend the rest of the eleven months making sure I have money for those checks. As some wise person once said: "Life is hilariously cruel."

Anywho, I figure that since I started this blog last year with something that I hope was profound, maybe I'll give it another try...

So here's an interesting subject: Collective Consciousness

I didn't coin that, and heaven knows I didn't come up with it either. However, I believe that humanity as a species is heading towards a few ultimate parallels in the definitions of collective consciousness. Let me explain...

There is a singular link between creatures who inhabit a particular band of the conscious hierarchy, and this is known as their "collective consciousness." Basically, this is the intrinsic desire for beings to focus on desires and needs which are common to their species, whether they are ants on the ground or humans (everywhere). On a level, a collective consciousness we all actively and knowingly engage in on a regular basis is feeding. As organisms we our bound to the desire to consume food. On a slightly more complex level, religion is a form of collective consciousness in that people are, to a degree, aligned towards the same particular desires and behaviors across the whole group. But the interesting, really sinister part, goes even deeper...

Before we step onto that side of the coin, though, let's talk about the unconscious society, first.

Ever heard of a man named Carl Jung? Around 1970 while working in the field of analytical psychology, he coined the term "collective unconscious." The term was later changed to "objective psyche" possibly because of "user" complaints, but the subject is highly fascinating.

You see, the concept goes that human beings, more precisely the individual self, drives the individual to actually make mistakes by using dreams, archetypes, and intuition. Apparently the ultimate objective is a concept known as "Individuation," which without using too many big words is the process by which a being becomes an individual among a homogeny of duplicates.

Here's the real ticker, though. The self, which is driving this process, can quite possibly be influenced or controlled by the collective conscious.

Getting creepy? Keep going...

As humans strive towards the instinctual need to become significant via their means (a process known as "self-actualization") they cannot help but find themselves caught in the currents of the social psyche. This, social psyche, is directly related to the collective consciousness, because it is in fact the disassociated biproduct of the entire collective-consciousness process. Ironically, the social psyche can also be seen as the cause of the collective conscience.

So let me reiterate this mess incase you're already starting to fade off.

The collective consciousness of the human organism essentially is driving a social psyche which in turn is acting to dictate the course of the collective conscience. Need an example? Well, that's a bit hard, but let's try this one:

1. An object of desire is created which people flock to. Suddenly the collective consciousness is directed towards that object of desire.

2. The collective unconscious is driving beings towards self-actualization, which leads to the creation of the object of desire. The collective consciousness, drives the collective unconsciousness which drives beings towards self-actualization, which drives the beings towards the object of desire.

3. The collective consciousness has now become the social psyche. The social psyche drives the collective consciousness of the beings towards the object of desire.

4. The collective consciousness is now influenced by the social psyche, which leads to the collective unconsciousness driving towards new self-actualization, which leads to new objects of desire based on the collective consciousness.


If you followed that, yay! If not, don't worry about it. :)


Okay, so here's the creepy, fascinating, insidious part: humanity is actually building a new collective conscious.

What is this new collective consciousness? It has a name: The Internet.

As a society we exchange information at blinding speeds today, but we also exchange something more. We exchange dispositions, desires, trends, beliefs, ideals, and much more. No longer is our society limited to the influences we directly percieve around us in the physical world, nor are we effected only by the voice or text communications prior to the advent of the Internet. Now, we have images, chat rooms, virtual realms, virtual concepts, digital ethics, digital laws, and most importantly, whole societies which cannot exist without the technology they deal with every day.

We are, in essence, forming a massive community of exchange, and our individuality is being exchanged, too.

In the end, we may find that our own individuality is not something dictated by a collective unconsciousness we recognize any longer. The Internet, may very well one day become our own consciousness, and our own subliminal driving force.

And that's enough for now...Cya!

Show Me the Technology!!!

It seems to me that we have a rather unusual problem. We have all this wonderful technology, and yet everyone is still using the most basic of things.

I had a series of teleconferences today. The objective was to get groups of remote meeting members together on a single subject. Teleconference. Simple chaining of phones together, it's nothing new, and it has some key advantages, but also disadvantages:

Advantages:

1. It's easy to do.
2. It's quick.
3. Anyone can initiate a teleconference (you don't need an IT person to setup a site or server, nor do you need a secretary to handle anything).

Disadvantages:

1. Phone communication isn't always clear, reliable, and stable.
2. It's hard to tell who's talking, sometimes. This is especially true when calling a large group of people you've never met or heard before.
3. If there are documents to discuss or slides to view, everyone has to get those individually.
4. Teleconferences void all the personable aspects of face-to-face communication.

So what's the deal? Technology exists out there that allows us to achieve excellent meetings, without us all being in the same place.

Whatever happened to the video phone? Why isn't video conferencing more common? We're not exactly at the dawn of these technologies, yet it doesn't seem like anyone's working on making these things happen. Why?

I should be able to video conference as easily as teleconferencing, but I can't.

I should be able to sit in front of my TV and have it like the "main screen" of the starship Enterprise. Incoming call, "Put it through!" and bam, I'm videoconferencing with my coworkers and clients at the push of a button, no different than picking up my cell phone and hitting "ANSWER".

And why not virtual meetings? No, I'm not talking about "virtual meeting" software. I mean, why hasn't the business world caught on to the advantages of communications that we see in online gaming?

Imagine, if you will, logging into the virtual realm of your business, and entering a room with the digitized characters that represent your coworkers and clients. On one side of the room, a presentation is being displayed. There's a virtual table that we all sit at (for psychological stability and comfort). Behind us is a digital model of the product that everyone can see and play with. When someone talks, a little icon appears above their head. Attendees would be able to log the entire session for later load and experience. The users themselves would have little heads-up displays around their screen, like some kind of business-oriented shooter. Calander, notes, attendee information, objectives.

It sounds far fetched, but the technology is actually already there and being used. It's just not being used in the business market.

So what is the reason why we don't do all this stuff?

I think the reason is because although the technology is there, it has yet to beat the interface of the phone.

Let's face it, which is easier? Picking up the phone and making a call? Or setting up a videoconference?

I believe a lot of technologies don't get used simply because they do too much, and don't do enough easily. People think in modules of action, not in whole packages. Fully-featured applications are great, because they put all the bells and whistles into one place, but the problem is that we don't like all those bells and whistles in one place when we work with the product.

Give me a product that allows me to video conference as quickly as I can teleconference, but which I can setup as quickly as I can setup a phone.

Don't give me a system that can organize everything in the office. I just want to organize my mailbox. That's it. Make the solution modular, so it can connect to other peices as I need them, but when I only want to organize my mailbox, that's all I see.

Okay, so I'm just rambling and ranting...but hey? Come on world! Let's get moving!

Now what did I do with my video goggles......